There are so many structured activities out there for teaching language and literacy to children, from flashcards to phonics programs and stencils. When all the research says that children learn best through play and the requirements of the NQF state that children should be at the centre of the program, and have choice and control over their learning, how well do these structured experiences meet the developmental and engagement needs of the children in our care?
Previously I have discussed the difficulty with large group experiences and ensuring that children are really getting out of these what we anticipate the outcomes to be. (These discussions can be seen in http://wp.me/p767Zb-r7 and http://wp.me/p767Zb-yD). Stencils and structured activities provide evidence, but what is the evidence necessarily of? If a child can rote learn to say the letters and their sounds, is that any different than a child learning to memorise the words to a song like twinkle twinkle, or let it go? Do they really understand the application of the content or have they just heard it so many times they have committed it to memory?
When it comes to stencils, are children really understanding the letters and the relationship and A has to an Apple when they trace the letters and write their own copy of the letter and colour in an apple? Or have we collected evidence of other skills such as following instructions, fine motor and pencil control and the ability to complete a task? How do we say for certain that they have knowledge of the letters just because they completed a stencil?
Neither of these types of activities has the child at the focus of them either, they are for ticking a box (sometimes metaphorically or sometimes literally on a check-list). What if a child can’t hold a pencil? Do they not get to learn letters because stencils are the tool of choice? What about children who cannot sit at a group experience and engage with the content because they are using their energy just to sit still, do they not get to learn about letters and their sounds?
It is also difficult, when children go to so many different types of school systems that have so many different styles of curriculum to ensure the way they are taught is the right way, and will meet the needs of the school. Most schools have such specific ways of teaching they would rather do it themselves and just have children interested in letters and language and ready to learn. (See http://wp.me/p767Zb-sE).
There are so many different ways to engage children in language and literacy experiences in our programs that are based on the children and their needs and it comes down to seeing the opportunity, as educators, and seizing this opportunity to help children learn. Here are just a few examples:
- Increasing the amount of text and symbols in your service. Whether it be magazines, catalogues, packaging, brochures, books, signs, keyboards, phones, money or similar, all these different types of media encourage and support children’s engagement with literacy. You can also add letters to your loose parts play through items such as scrabble tiles, pieces of alphabet games/puzzles that are broken, or even drawing letters onto stones. Through all these opportunities children are using illustrations to understand the text, they learn to turn pages right to left, they learn to recognise symbols and logos as always representing the same items – what child doesn’t know the McDonald’s logo? Children who can engage with text and symbols in a play based way will connect with the content more, explore, investigate and display their sense of agency in the experience. Educators can role model, engage with and challenge the children during play situations such as using a catalogue to make a shopping list with the children by cutting out what they need to buy and sticking these items to a piece of paper. Older children might want to add their own labels for the items too.
- Engaging in conversations. The best way to increase the amount of language children learn is to increase the amount of language they are exposed to during the day. Talk to the children, sing around the children, with infants you can label actions so they get used to language and start to absorb it all. When using language with children don’t be afraid to use big words, or new words, but make sure they understand the meaning of the word and explain it if necessary. Sometimes adding tools like pretend phones will also increase the amount of language children use, or providing opportunities to re-tell known stories or create their own with puppets, felt pieces of similar resources.
- Adding literacy opportunities to different play areas. I often like to make letters out of play-dough when I play alongside the children. I don’t make them do it, or even draw attention to what I am doing, instead I draw the attention of those who are interested. Some recognise letters from their name, or can say the name of the letters. Others want to have a turn too. Another thing I like to do when sitting at the sand pit is pick up a stick and draw or write in the sand on the edge. It is amazing how often children who are afraid to pick up a pencil and write on paper, often because of the permanency of this, will draw or write in sand with a stick because it just disappears when someone walks on it. I also add literacy opportunities for children to record their ideas with clipboards, paper and pencils whether they be creating a plan to find treasure in the yard, recording the injuries in the doctor’s office or documenting their findings when searching for bugs in the bushes.
- Creating meaningful opportunities for children. Instead of writing a stencil filled with the same letter or a child’s name, which may seem pointless to a child, I get those children eager to write to help me with tasks I needed documented. Signs around the room, labels on drawers in the office, headings for forms given to parents, all created by children. The purpose of this was twofold. Firstly the children were developing their skills in letter formation, awareness of words and using text to make meaning. Secondly those who entered the service saw that learning was at the centre of the program and each child was given the opportunity to engage with learning in meaningful and diverse ways that reflected the needs of the individual children.
If you would like to subscribe to my monthly newsletter for tips, ideas and upcoming events subscribe here http://eepurl.com/b7KQHT